DC Drug Law - US Supreme Court Deciding if Immigrants Should Be Deported Following Minor Drug Offenses
Practicing law in the nation's capitol, a Washington DC criminal attorney largely concerned with updating the public on the latest changes in national law that could affect any individuals who have been accused of drug possession or drug distribution charges. Conviction of criminal charges can have life-changing consequences for American citizens--however, as seen by the example of Carachuri Rosendo, being caught with drugs more than once could result in deportation for immigrants to the United States.
Rosendo moved to the United States when he was four years-old, residing here ever since. In 2004 he was convicted of possession of marijuana, and in 2005 he was charged with a secondary offense for having one Xanax pill without a subscription. Even though Rosendo currently lives with his fiancée and four children, all of whom are American citizens, he was deported following the second series of minor drug possession charges.
The national government stated that the original marijuana possession is characterized as an aggravated felony requiring deportation. However, Rosendo was tried in a state court under state law, and was not convicted as a repeat offender. The high court is set to hear this particular case at the end of March, debating whether documented immigrants who have been convicted of multiple drug-related crimes be subject to deportation. Essentially, the issue concerns whether a second drug possession offense should be elevated to an aggravated felony, and therefore requiring deportation. Additionally, receiving the label of aggravated felony prevents immigrants from petitioning their deportation to an immigration judge.
Supporters of Rosendo's cause point out that unlike the judgment of aggravated felonies, no other drug-related reasons for deporting immigrants (controlled substance, drug abuser or drug addict) prevented the individual from petitioning on their behalf. Additionally, there are several preceding cases that involve repeat drug-offending immigrants who were allowed to stay in the country and proceeded to become law-abiding citizens. Immigrants' rights advocates are anxious for the Supreme Court to take notice of these stories, and fix the inconsistencies in immigration law.
This article is presented by The Law Offices of David Benowitz, representing clients in Washington DC, Maryland and Virginia. For more information, please visit our Maryland Criminal Attorneys and Virginia Criminal Attorneys websites.
