Because a Washington DC criminal attorney practices law in a metropolitan area, it is common to represent individuals accused with a variety of criminal charges including sex offenses. However, it is important to take into consideration who the accuser really is--as seen by the example of two small town police officers determined to tarnish each other's names through a string of accusations of criminal charges.
Small-town police chief Michael Meissner was arrested this past September following accusations that he was sending graphic text messages to underage boys, trying to lure them to sex parties. Investigating officer, John Hoskins, discovered over 5,000 inappropriate text messages in which Messiner allegedly attempted to entice young boys to his home with alcohol, drugs, and a video camera. Hoskin's cell phone warrant also discovered that Meissner has received nude pictures of boys under the age of eighteen.
However, a week afterwards, Messiner walked out of the jail a free man. The seven charges and $1.5 million bail against him have been dropped. Hoskins is shocked at the release, while Meissner denies sending any of the messages. Additionally, he believed that Hoskins has trumped up the accusations to attack him personally.
The two men have a feud extending a number of years. Both men are law enforcement officials who have a nomadic career history--Meissner has worked at eighteen different agencies in twenty years. And since 1999, Hoskins has had fourteen separate appointments, never lasting over five months. Although neither man has a perfect reputation among officers, their dislike of one another is well-known.
In 2006, both men applied for the chief of police position a small town of almost two hundred and twenty-five people. Meissner got the job, and hired Hoskins to work for him later. Shortly into his employment under Meissner, Hoskins began investigating whether his boss watched pornography with a minor on a city-owned computer. The investigation hardly began, however, as Hoskins was fired shortly afterwards. Since, the two men have been on a mission to tarnish the other's reputation. Meissner has allegedly called around to various police agencies to either get him fired or prevent him from being hired in the first place. Hoskins has fired back by making a website insulting Meissner and relentlessly investigating the police chief.
Many in the local law enforcement community feel the same way about Meissner as they do about Hoskins, and the accusations they fire against one another. Because it is common knowledge that they are rivals, it is difficult for other officers and investigators to take allegations seriously--portions of the story could be exaggerated or fabricated to spite the other. According to George Spurgeon, an eighteen year police veteran who worked with Meissner and is familiar with Hoskins, "Most of the officers I know would say we'd probably be better off in the law enforcement community if both of them were not police officers." The general dislike of both officers could be a reason why they are both professionally nomadic, and charges against Meissner have been dropped.
This article is presented by The Law Offices of David Benowitz, representing clients in Washington DC, Maryland and Virginia. For more information, please visit our Maryland Sex Crimes Lawyer and Virginia Sex Crimes Lawyer web pages.